Governor Ayodele Fayose |
The Supreme Court, in its judgment on Tuesday,
held that none of the grounds of appeal was proved by the appellant.
It held that while impeachment was not a ground
of disqualification from contesting as governor under section 182 of Nigeria’s
constitution, the panel which recommended Fayose for impeachment on October 16,
2006, was illegally and unconstitutionally constituted.
It also held that the allegation of certificate
forgery had been caught by the principle of “issue estoppel” as it had been
laid to rest since 2004 by the Court of Appeal’s judgment in the case of
Alliance for Democracy.
According to the apex court, the Court of Appeal
had, in the said judgment, held that the HND certificate was genuinely earned
by and awarded to Fayose.
On the issue of militarisation and harassment of
leaders of the APC, the Supreme Court held that the Chief of Defence Staff and
the Inspector-General of Police, joined as 4th and 5th defendants in the case
were not necessary parties.
The apex court held that the actions of the men
and officers of the two defendants that allegedly harassed the APC leaders
during the election and whose names were not mentioned could also not be
answerable for by the INEC as stipulated by the Electoral Act.
No comments:
Post a Comment