THE Senate President, Bukola Saraki, on
Tuesday entered the dock at the Code of Conduct Tribunal in Abuja where
he was arraigned for false assets declaration charges.
Saraki arrived at the tribunal at 9.20am
in company with 50 senators, beating by 40 minutes the 10am deadline
the judge had set for the Inspector General of Police to provide the
Senate president.
He pleaded not guilty to all the 13
charges slammed on him by the Code of Conduct Bureau and his trial has
been scheduled to hold on October 21, 22 and 23.
Saraki appeared at the tribunal after the courts had refused his request that the proceedings at the CCT be stopped.
From the dock on Tuesday, the Senate
president said he was hearing about the charges against him for the
first time, saying he ought to have been invited and briefed by the CCB
as the Senate president.
He said, “I am the Senate President and I
have respect for the rule of law. Mr. Chairman, I observed that they
have made reference to the good work the Senate has done in the
administration of criminal justice. If there is an allegation of false
declaration of assets, the Code of Conduct Bureau shall refer the person
involved to the tribunal after giving the person an opportunity to
explain if the facts are true. But in this case, I was not given the
opportunity.
“I thought the CCB should have called me
and given me the right to fair hearing. I am hearing about the charges
for the first time. We are all here and the whole world is watching when
we said we are in new Nigeria. I want to state here that I am not
guilty.”
Saraki’s lawyer, Joseph Daudu, SAN,
challenged the jurisdiction of the tribunal, saying the CCT was not a
court of criminal jurisdiction and as such, the administration of
criminal court did not apply.
Citing Section 693, paragraph 18 (1) of
the Constitution, Daudu reminded the tribunal of the ruling of a High
Court in a case involving a former governor of Plateau State, Joshua
Dariye, which held that the CCT did not have jurisdiction over criminal
cases and submitted that the tribunal lacked the jurisdiction to try the
accused under criminal act where he would be required to be docked.
But the prosecution counsel, Rotimi
Jacobs, also a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, opposed the application,
saying the tribunal had ruled on jurisdiction last Friday. Jacobs
submitted further that Section 2 (1) of the Administration of Justice
Act gives the tribunal powers to handle the criminal charges against
Saraki.
After listening to the arguments of both
parties, Justice Danladi Umar held that the tribunal had the
jurisdiction to compel the Senate President to not only appear in person
but to also be moved to the dock.
He said, “It is in the view of the
tribunal that the trial before it is criminal in nature and it has
jurisdiction over criminal matters, the defendant should therefore
proceed to the dock.”
While proceedings to the dock, Saraki
expressed shock that the tribunal had chosen to be ignorant of the
stipulations under which the defendant could be brought to court.
He was however granted bail in self recognition and the warrant the tribunal had issued for his arrest was quashed.
As a governor of his home Kwara State
between 2003 and 2011, Saraki was alleged to have make false declaration
of his assets, including an alleged anticipatory declaration of asset
yet to be acquired.
He is also being accused of owing an
American Express credit card account during his tenure as governor.
Public officials are forbidden from operating foreign accounts while in
office.
But Saraki had earlier shunned the CCT and asked a Federal High Court in Abuja to stop the tribunal’s proceedings against him.
However when he failed to appear before
it last Friday, the tribunal chairman had issued a warrant, compelling
the IG to arrest the Senate President.
The warrant had spurred Saraki to run to
the Appeal Court, asking it to quash the warrant and to stop the
procceding of the tribunal.
The two courts on Monday refused his requests.
“To appear before the tribunal is not a death sentence,” Justice Morri Adumein of the Court of Appeal had told Saraki.
The senators that followed Saraki to the
tribunal on Tuesday included his deputy, Ike Ekweremadu; Shaaba
Lafiaji, Theodore Orji, Mao Ohuabunwa, Samuel Egwu, Ben Murray-Bruce,
Aliyu Wamakko, Gilbert Nnaji, Kabiru Gaya, Alasoadura, Samuel Anyawu and
Foster Ogola.
Others were Sunny Ogborji, Aliyu Sabi
Abdullahi, Isa Hamma Missau, Emmanuel Paulker, Obinna Ogba, Kaura
Tijani, Clifford Ordia, Ibrahim Abdullahi, Peter Nwaoboshi, Rose Okoh,
Mohammed Ohiare, Gershom Bassey, Olaka Nwogu and Lanre Tejuosho.
Meanwhile, some senators on Tuesday
expressed confidence that Nigeria and its democracy would be the
ultimate beneficiaries at the end of the trial of the Senate President.
The spokesman for the Senators, Ibrahim
Danbaba, said this while reacting on behalf of his colleagues to the
arraignment of Saraki at the CCT.
Dambaba said, “We also want to state
here, on behalf of our colleagues, that the Senate remains solidly
behind Senator Saraki and we express our unalloyed support for his
leadership.
“We reiterate the fact that he is our
choice for the post of Senate President and no politically motivated,
mischievous and vindictive trial will change our opinion of him.”
In a statement after the tribunal
proceedings, Saraki said he was being tried because he was the Senate
president and that his trial indicated flagrant disregard of due
process.
The statement by his spokesman, Yusuph
Olaniyonu, read in part, “Today, I appeared before the Code of Conduct
Tribunal for the commencement of my trial in a case concerning the asset
declaration form I filled in 2003 after I have explored the opportunity
to defend my fundamental human rights in other courts.
My appearance in court today once again demonstrates my belief in the rule of law and respect for the judiciary of our country.
As I stated while taking the plea in the
case, I reiterate my belief that the only reason while I am going
through this trial is because I am Senate President. If I were to be
just a Senator, I doubt if anybody will be interested in the asset
declaration form I filled over 12 years ago.
“It is my humble opinion that this case
is a vivid example that there is still flagrant disregard for due
process in our polity. This trial is not only being observed by
Nigerians alone, the international community is watching because Nigeria
is a key member of this community. So, the executive, legislature and
judiciary should do the right thing that will truly demonstrate that we
have imbibed the spirit of positive change.”
No comments:
Post a Comment